Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts

Friday, 27 September 2013

Exclusive: T. Rowe bans some American Air employees from fund trading

By Jed Horowitz

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:34am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - T. Rowe Price Group Inc has permanently banned about 1,300 American Airlines employees from trading among its funds in their 401(k) retirement plans, a rare move to curb "collective" trading by subscribers to an investment newsletter.

About 800 additional employees have received warning letters about their trading patterns, according to sources at the airline and at JPMorgan Chase & Co, administrator of the retirement plan.

The ban, confirmed by the airline and the fund company in response to a Reuters inquiry, follows a period of several years in which T. Rowe Price imposed a series of temporary trading restrictions on some subscribers to the EZTracker LLC newsletter for American Airlines employees.

The newsletter suggests monthly mutual fund trades to more than 2,000 subscribers who invest in the company's defined contribution plan known as $uper $aver 401(k). The plan has more than 80,000 participants.

When large numbers of investors trade mutual funds in lockstep, it can force fund managers to buy and sell securities at inopportune times. They may have to find securities to buy in a hurry if the pack invests all at once, and may have to sell quickly to pay off sellers who cash out together.

T. Rowe Price spokesman Bill Benintende said collective trading can disrupt portfolio managers' strategies and raise costs for long-term investors.

"In limited situations" the company's funds restrict investors who significantly alter their holdings on the advice of a newsletter, he wrote in an emailed statement confirming the ban. He declined to name the newsletter or discuss other specifics.

Investment newsletter veterans said a permanent ban is highly unusual, and raises questions about why a giant like T. Rowe Price, which manages $614 billion, would single out activities of a small group of people. The controversy comes as workers' anxiety about managing their own retirement investments grows, while employers close company-paid and professionally managed pension plans.

"It's like taking a chainsaw to an ingrown toenail," said Dan Wiener, publisher of "Independent Advisor," a newsletter for investors in Vanguard Group funds. Wiener said he knew of no similar cases.

PILOT COMPLAINTS

The publishers of EZTracker's newsletter for American Airlines employees said many of its subscribers were banned. They did not know if other airline employees were also affected.

An American Airlines spokesman said the company in its role as plan sponsor has acted appropriately. Despite the ban, all plan participants still can put new payroll deductions into T. Rowe Price's funds or cash out of them, he emphasized. They cannot trade among the four T. Rowe Price funds in the plan, which has about 26 other investment choices.

Still, the restriction is rankling employees at a sensitive time.

Two weeks ago, the U.S. Justice Department sued to block the merger of American Airlines' bankrupt parent AMR Corp with U.S. Airways Group.

Last month, American distributed about $3.5 billion to pilots from a company-funded, professionally managed pension plan it had shuttered.

To avoid tax penalties, most pilots are reinvesting the money in 401(k) plans and other retirement vehicles.

"They have kept me from some of the better performing funds," William Simons, an American Airlines pilot wrote to Reuters in an e-mail. "We thought we were doing everything legally, yet we were punished."

HIGH-YIELD TRIGGER?

T. Rowe Price covered itself by amending the prospectuses of its funds in the American plan in 2010, according to some lawyers who declined to be named because they work with the firm. The new language permits each fund at its discretion to reject trades that "could dilute the value of the fund's shares, including trading by shareholders acting collectively (e.g., following the advice of a newsletter)."

EZTracker's co-publishers Paul Burger and former American Airlines captain Michael DiBerardino call the restrictions anti-competitive and vague. "We are being held to a standard that's not being applied to other newsletters, publications or investment advisers," Burger said.

The permanent ban was probably triggered by EZTracker's April 1 suggestion that employees sell T. Rowe's High Yield Fund, which it had suggested buying five months earlier, he said in an interview.

EZTracker has recommended exiting T. Rowe Price funds in American's 401(k) plan six times since mid-2010 after a holding period of less than a year, Burger said.

The recommendations trigger a rush of buys and sells in the days following the end-of-month release of the newsletter, Burger acknowledges. He voiced doubts that those would be significant enough to affect the performance of such large funds. The other funds in the plan are T. Rowe's Science & Technology, MidCap Growth and New Horizons funds.

Since 2010, T. Rowe Price has sent a series of warning letters and outright one-year trading bans to several subscribers, some of whom complained to EZTracker.

SEC COMPLAINT

In May 2012, EZTracker filed a complaint with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, saying that the then-temporary restrictions were "discriminatory and anti- competitive." It said it had received complaints from hundreds of subscribers, claiming they were injured by the bans.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment on the status of the complaint.

The T. Rowe Price letters were sent through JPMorgan, which also markets a managed account service called JPMorgan Personal Asset Manager to participants in many of the plans it administers.

EZTracker charges $84.95 a year for its newsletter while JPMorgan charges an asset management fee that can result in charges of $945 for a $250,000 account. Unlike the newsletter, which simply advises subscribers who make their own trades, the JPMorgan program makes trades on behalf of participants.

Burger said he suspected JPMorgan helped orchestrate the trading bans to further its own advisory services among highly compensated airline employees. The complaint to the SEC said the bank's willingness to enforce the bans is "self-serving."

"I'm sure they would like to manage the 401(k) plans of all our subscribers," Burger wrote in an email.

The bank dismissed the claims.

"JPMorgan in its role as a plan service provider and financial intermediary for the funds has acted appropriately and as directed by the plan sponsor and the fund provider," bank spokeswoman Kristen Chambers wrote in an email.

"All communication to participants is plan-sanctioned, including any mention of the managed account feature."

(Reporting by Jed Horowitz; Editing by Paritosh Bansal, Andrew Hay and Jeffrey Benkoe)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

Three charged with stealing source code, data from trading firm

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:37pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two men have been charged by New York prosecutors with stealing secret computer code from a high-frequency trading firm in an effort to start their own business.

Jason Vuu, a former trader at Flow Traders LLC in Manhattan, was charged with emailing himself trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from the firm and sharing the code with another man, Simon Lu, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.

Another former trader at Flow Traders, Glen Cressman, was charged with copying files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms without permission, the complaints said.

Paul Shechtman, a lawyer for Lu, and Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for Vuu, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

Charles Ross, who represents Cressman, said his client was innocent.

"He was a fine employee, and when everything about the case is aired, it will be clear he did nothing wrong," Ross said.

The arrests came a year after Vance's office charged former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov with stealing secret trading code. Aleynikov was convicted in federal court for the same actions, but his conviction was thrown out in February 2012 by an appeals court, which said federal espionage laws did not cover his alleged theft.

Vance then charged Aleynikov under New York state law. Earlier this year, a judge denied Aleynikov's attempt to have the state charges dismissed on double jeopardy grounds. Aleynikov, who pleaded not guilty, is free on bail.

Both Vance and Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office brought the initial case against Aleynikov, have made combating computer crime and corporate espionage a top priority.

Lu, Vuu and Cressman all face multiple counts of unlawful duplication of computer-related material and unauthorized use of secret scientific material, the same charges Aleynikov is facing. The charges carry up to four years in prison.

Vuu sent copies of files from his work email account to his personal email address 10 times from August 2011 to August 2012, the complaint alleged. He also shared source code with Lu via the file-hosting service Dropbox after Lu suggested the code could help them start their own firm, according to the complaint.

Cressman's personal email account received copied files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms twice in December 2012, according to the complaint.

The charges were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Dan Grebler)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Exclusive: T. Rowe bans some American Air employees from fund trading

By Jed Horowitz

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:34am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - T. Rowe Price Group Inc has permanently banned about 1,300 American Airlines employees from trading among its funds in their 401(k) retirement plans, a rare move to curb "collective" trading by subscribers to an investment newsletter.

About 800 additional employees have received warning letters about their trading patterns, according to sources at the airline and at JPMorgan Chase & Co, administrator of the retirement plan.

The ban, confirmed by the airline and the fund company in response to a Reuters inquiry, follows a period of several years in which T. Rowe Price imposed a series of temporary trading restrictions on some subscribers to the EZTracker LLC newsletter for American Airlines employees.

The newsletter suggests monthly mutual fund trades to more than 2,000 subscribers who invest in the company's defined contribution plan known as $uper $aver 401(k). The plan has more than 80,000 participants.

When large numbers of investors trade mutual funds in lockstep, it can force fund managers to buy and sell securities at inopportune times. They may have to find securities to buy in a hurry if the pack invests all at once, and may have to sell quickly to pay off sellers who cash out together.

T. Rowe Price spokesman Bill Benintende said collective trading can disrupt portfolio managers' strategies and raise costs for long-term investors.

"In limited situations" the company's funds restrict investors who significantly alter their holdings on the advice of a newsletter, he wrote in an emailed statement confirming the ban. He declined to name the newsletter or discuss other specifics.

Investment newsletter veterans said a permanent ban is highly unusual, and raises questions about why a giant like T. Rowe Price, which manages $614 billion, would single out activities of a small group of people. The controversy comes as workers' anxiety about managing their own retirement investments grows, while employers close company-paid and professionally managed pension plans.

"It's like taking a chainsaw to an ingrown toenail," said Dan Wiener, publisher of "Independent Advisor," a newsletter for investors in Vanguard Group funds. Wiener said he knew of no similar cases.

PILOT COMPLAINTS

The publishers of EZTracker's newsletter for American Airlines employees said many of its subscribers were banned. They did not know if other airline employees were also affected.

An American Airlines spokesman said the company in its role as plan sponsor has acted appropriately. Despite the ban, all plan participants still can put new payroll deductions into T. Rowe Price's funds or cash out of them, he emphasized. They cannot trade among the four T. Rowe Price funds in the plan, which has about 26 other investment choices.

Still, the restriction is rankling employees at a sensitive time.

Two weeks ago, the U.S. Justice Department sued to block the merger of American Airlines' bankrupt parent AMR Corp with U.S. Airways Group.

Last month, American distributed about $3.5 billion to pilots from a company-funded, professionally managed pension plan it had shuttered.

To avoid tax penalties, most pilots are reinvesting the money in 401(k) plans and other retirement vehicles.

"They have kept me from some of the better performing funds," William Simons, an American Airlines pilot wrote to Reuters in an e-mail. "We thought we were doing everything legally, yet we were punished."

HIGH-YIELD TRIGGER?

T. Rowe Price covered itself by amending the prospectuses of its funds in the American plan in 2010, according to some lawyers who declined to be named because they work with the firm. The new language permits each fund at its discretion to reject trades that "could dilute the value of the fund's shares, including trading by shareholders acting collectively (e.g., following the advice of a newsletter)."

EZTracker's co-publishers Paul Burger and former American Airlines captain Michael DiBerardino call the restrictions anti-competitive and vague. "We are being held to a standard that's not being applied to other newsletters, publications or investment advisers," Burger said.

The permanent ban was probably triggered by EZTracker's April 1 suggestion that employees sell T. Rowe's High Yield Fund, which it had suggested buying five months earlier, he said in an interview.

EZTracker has recommended exiting T. Rowe Price funds in American's 401(k) plan six times since mid-2010 after a holding period of less than a year, Burger said.

The recommendations trigger a rush of buys and sells in the days following the end-of-month release of the newsletter, Burger acknowledges. He voiced doubts that those would be significant enough to affect the performance of such large funds. The other funds in the plan are T. Rowe's Science & Technology, MidCap Growth and New Horizons funds.

Since 2010, T. Rowe Price has sent a series of warning letters and outright one-year trading bans to several subscribers, some of whom complained to EZTracker.

SEC COMPLAINT

In May 2012, EZTracker filed a complaint with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, saying that the then-temporary restrictions were "discriminatory and anti- competitive." It said it had received complaints from hundreds of subscribers, claiming they were injured by the bans.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment on the status of the complaint.

The T. Rowe Price letters were sent through JPMorgan, which also markets a managed account service called JPMorgan Personal Asset Manager to participants in many of the plans it administers.

EZTracker charges $84.95 a year for its newsletter while JPMorgan charges an asset management fee that can result in charges of $945 for a $250,000 account. Unlike the newsletter, which simply advises subscribers who make their own trades, the JPMorgan program makes trades on behalf of participants.

Burger said he suspected JPMorgan helped orchestrate the trading bans to further its own advisory services among highly compensated airline employees. The complaint to the SEC said the bank's willingness to enforce the bans is "self-serving."

"I'm sure they would like to manage the 401(k) plans of all our subscribers," Burger wrote in an email.

The bank dismissed the claims.

"JPMorgan in its role as a plan service provider and financial intermediary for the funds has acted appropriately and as directed by the plan sponsor and the fund provider," bank spokeswoman Kristen Chambers wrote in an email.

"All communication to participants is plan-sanctioned, including any mention of the managed account feature."

(Reporting by Jed Horowitz; Editing by Paritosh Bansal, Andrew Hay and Jeffrey Benkoe)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, 26 August 2013

Three charged with stealing source code, data from trading firm

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:37pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two men have been charged by New York prosecutors with stealing secret computer code from a high-frequency trading firm in an effort to start their own business.

Jason Vuu, a former trader at Flow Traders LLC in Manhattan, was charged with emailing himself trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from the firm and sharing the code with another man, Simon Lu, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.

Another former trader at Flow Traders, Glen Cressman, was charged with copying files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms without permission, the complaints said.

Paul Shechtman, a lawyer for Lu, and Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for Vuu, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

Charles Ross, who represents Cressman, said his client was innocent.

"He was a fine employee, and when everything about the case is aired, it will be clear he did nothing wrong," Ross said.

The arrests came a year after Vance's office charged former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov with stealing secret trading code. Aleynikov was convicted in federal court for the same actions, but his conviction was thrown out in February 2012 by an appeals court, which said federal espionage laws did not cover his alleged theft.

Vance then charged Aleynikov under New York state law. Earlier this year, a judge denied Aleynikov's attempt to have the state charges dismissed on double jeopardy grounds. Aleynikov, who pleaded not guilty, is free on bail.

Both Vance and Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office brought the initial case against Aleynikov, have made combating computer crime and corporate espionage a top priority.

Lu, Vuu and Cressman all face multiple counts of unlawful duplication of computer-related material and unauthorized use of secret scientific material, the same charges Aleynikov is facing. The charges carry up to four years in prison.

Vuu sent copies of files from his work email account to his personal email address 10 times from August 2011 to August 2012, the complaint alleged. He also shared source code with Lu via the file-hosting service Dropbox after Lu suggested the code could help them start their own firm, according to the complaint.

Cressman's personal email account received copied files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms twice in December 2012, according to the complaint.

The charges were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Dan Grebler)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Three charged with stealing source code, data from trading firm

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:37pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two men have been charged by New York prosecutors with stealing secret computer code from a high-frequency trading firm in an effort to start their own business.

Jason Vuu, a former trader at Flow Traders LLC in Manhattan, was charged with emailing himself trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from the firm and sharing the code with another man, Simon Lu, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.

Another former trader at Flow Traders, Glen Cressman, was charged with copying files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms without permission, the complaints said.

Paul Shechtman, a lawyer for Lu, and Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for Vuu, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

Charles Ross, who represents Cressman, said his client was innocent.

"He was a fine employee, and when everything about the case is aired, it will be clear he did nothing wrong," Ross said.

The arrests came a year after Vance's office charged former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov with stealing secret trading code. Aleynikov was convicted in federal court for the same actions, but his conviction was thrown out in February 2012 by an appeals court, which said federal espionage laws did not cover his alleged theft.

Vance then charged Aleynikov under New York state law. Earlier this year, a judge denied Aleynikov's attempt to have the state charges dismissed on double jeopardy grounds. Aleynikov, who pleaded not guilty, is free on bail.

Both Vance and Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office brought the initial case against Aleynikov, have made combating computer crime and corporate espionage a top priority.

Lu, Vuu and Cressman all face multiple counts of unlawful duplication of computer-related material and unauthorized use of secret scientific material, the same charges Aleynikov is facing. The charges carry up to four years in prison.

Vuu sent copies of files from his work email account to his personal email address 10 times from August 2011 to August 2012, the complaint alleged. He also shared source code with Lu via the file-hosting service Dropbox after Lu suggested the code could help them start their own firm, according to the complaint.

Cressman's personal email account received copied files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms twice in December 2012, according to the complaint.

The charges were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Dan Grebler)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Three charged with stealing source code, data from trading firm

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK | Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:37pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two men have been charged by New York prosecutors with stealing secret computer code from a high-frequency trading firm in an effort to start their own business.

Jason Vuu, a former trader at Flow Traders LLC in Manhattan, was charged with emailing himself trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from the firm and sharing the code with another man, Simon Lu, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.

Another former trader at Flow Traders, Glen Cressman, was charged with copying files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms without permission, the complaints said.

Paul Shechtman, a lawyer for Lu, and Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for Vuu, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

Charles Ross, who represents Cressman, said his client was innocent.

"He was a fine employee, and when everything about the case is aired, it will be clear he did nothing wrong," Ross said.

The arrests came a year after Vance's office charged former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov with stealing secret trading code. Aleynikov was convicted in federal court for the same actions, but his conviction was thrown out in February 2012 by an appeals court, which said federal espionage laws did not cover his alleged theft.

Vance then charged Aleynikov under New York state law. Earlier this year, a judge denied Aleynikov's attempt to have the state charges dismissed on double jeopardy grounds. Aleynikov, who pleaded not guilty, is free on bail.

Both Vance and Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office brought the initial case against Aleynikov, have made combating computer crime and corporate espionage a top priority.

Lu, Vuu and Cressman all face multiple counts of unlawful duplication of computer-related material and unauthorized use of secret scientific material, the same charges Aleynikov is facing. The charges carry up to four years in prison.

Vuu sent copies of files from his work email account to his personal email address 10 times from August 2011 to August 2012, the complaint alleged. He also shared source code with Lu via the file-hosting service Dropbox after Lu suggested the code could help them start their own firm, according to the complaint.

Cressman's personal email account received copied files containing trading strategies and valuation algorithms twice in December 2012, according to the complaint.

The charges were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Dan Grebler)


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Nasdaq Trading Halted Due To Computer Glitch

Please upgrade your web browser

We no longer check to see whether Sky News displays properly in Internet Explorer version 6 or earlier.

To see our content at its best we recommend upgrading if you wish to continue using Internet Explorer or using another browser such as Firefox, Safari or Google Chrome.

See more information about browsers and a list of browsers to choose from.

This website uses cookies. Cookies remember you so we can give you a better service online. By using this website or closing this message you are agreeing to our cookies notice. Cookies FAQs.

ADTECH_showAd( 4037570, document, false);
2:05pm UK, Friday 23 August 2013 Nasdaq Exchange Halts Trading Due To Technical Issue The Nasdaq stock exchange in New York City

By Sky News US Team, in New York

The latest high-tech disruption in the financial markets has increased pressure on Nasdaq and other electronic exchanges to take steps to avoid future breakdowns.

A three-hour trading outage on the Nasdaq stock exchange on Thursday is expected to trigger new rounds of regulatory scrutiny on computer-driven trading, as investors' shaky confidence in the markets takes another hit.

Trading in the Nasdaq, a major stock exchange dominated by the biggest names in technology, suffered the outage after a "technical glitch".

The disruption sent brokers scurrying to figure out what went wrong and raised new questions about the pitfalls of computer-driven stock trading.

Other US exchanges continued trading normally.

Nasdaq CEO Robert Greifeld said that unspecified, external factors caused the glitch, and that the exchange followed all the proper procedures to correct the problem.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg remotely rings bell to open trade on Nasdaq Facebook's float on the Nasdaq was hit by glitches

"We all have to be aware of the other person not acting always in the proper way, and you have to have your system be able to handle defensive driving," Mr Greifeld said.

"We're deeply disappointed with what happened yesterday. We aspire to perfection. We want to get to 100% up time."

The Nasdaq freeze echoed earlier stock market problems, such as the sudden plunge in stocks in May 2010 that came to be known as the "flash crash" and the glitch-plagued initial public offering of Facebook last year.

The exchange sent out an alert to traders saying that trading was being halted until further notice because of problems with a quote dissemination system.

Nasdaq said it would not cancel any open orders on Thursday, but that customers could cancel orders if they wanted to.

Securities and Exchange Commission spokesman John Nester said: "We are monitoring the situation and are in close contact with the exchanges."

(function(d){ var js, ref = d.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; js = d.createElement('script'); js.id = 'outbrainjs'; js.async = true; js.src = "//widgets.outbrain.com/outbrain.js"; ref.parentNode.insertBefore(js, ref); }(document));

Friday, 23 August 2013

Nasdaq CEO says resolved Thursday trading halt, sees no liability: CNBC

Robert Greifeld, CEO of the Nasdaq-OMX Stock Market, speaks at the Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P. global exchange and brokerage conference in New York June 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 27 July 2013

U.S. charges SAC Capital with insider trading crimes

United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Segar

1 of 5. United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

By Emily Flitter, Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:49pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors indicted billionaire Steven A. Cohen's hedge fund for insider trading, a rare move that could end the career of one of Wall Street's most successful investors and trigger a fundamental change in how traders try to gain an edge over rivals.

The government accused SAC Capital Advisors LP of presiding over a culture where employees flouted the law and were encouraged to tap their personal networks of contacts for inside information about publicly traded companies.

The result was "insider trading that was substantial, pervasive and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry," the indictment said.

While not personally charged criminally, Cohen joins junk bond financier Michael Milken and Galleon Group hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam among prominent Wall Street executives who have been linked to insider trading.

The indictment filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against SAC, together with a related civil case seeking forfeitures and money laundering penalties, imperils the future of the roughly $15 billion hedge fund.

It also may end Cohen's career of managing outside money, where he generated some of the hedge fund industry's best returns and became one of the foremost traders of his generation.

Last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Cohen in a civil case with failing to supervise two employees, Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg. Both men have pleaded not guilty to criminal insider trading charges and face trials in November.

Many Wall Street firms that lend money to and trade with Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC may stop or pull back because of Thursday's criminal charges, though some said on they would take a wait-and-see approach.

Cohen may yet be able to stay in business because more than $8 billion of the fund's assets belong to him and his employees.

SAC said in a statement it has no plans to shut down.

"SAC has never encouraged, promoted or tolerated insider trading and takes its compliance and management obligations seriously," it said. "The handful of men who admit they broke the law does not reflect the honesty, integrity and character of the thousands of men and women who have worked at SAC over the past 21 years. SAC will continue to operate as we work through these matters."

VIRTUAL SLAM DUNK?

The government's indictment of SAC Capital also will stand as the signature action of its multi-year crackdown on insider trading in the $2.25 trillion hedge fund industry.

The investigation burst into the open in October 2009 with the arrest of Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, and led to the conviction of more than 60 people including Rajaratnam. But for authorities Cohen always was the big fish to be caught because he loomed large over the hedge fund industry.

In fact, when Cohen first opened shop, hedge funds were not well understood and the industry was a fraction of its current size, with funds managing well under $1 trillion. But in large part because of the success of firms like SAC Capital, hedge fund managers surpassed investment bankers and even some bank chief executive officers in terms of fame and fortune.

Over the years, Cohen has been the subject of two Vanity Fair magazine stories, countless front-page stories in The New York Times, and is maybe just as famous in the art world for his prized collection of works by Damien Hirst, Jeff Koons and Pablo Picasso.

More recently, he tried to become the owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, but instead settled for a minority stake in the New York Mets. As the scrutiny of Cohen and his firm has risen in recent year, he's became more visible at hedge fund events, donating money to charities and buying even more artwork.

Several lawyers, including former federal prosecutors, said a decision not to criminally charge Cohen might signal an admission that there is a shortage of evidence against him.

But the indictment does not preclude the government from gathering more evidence and filing new charges later. Some lawyers believe the case against SAC is strong now.

"It's going to be a virtual slam dunk for the prosecution," said Solomon Wisenberg, a partner at Barnes & Thornburg in Washington, D.C., and author of "White Collar Crime: Securities Fraud."

"The story is basically that there's a whole culture here where red flags were ignored, (and) compliance efforts were more or less window dressing."

The Justice Department's decision to indict SAC, and not just individuals, is an unusual move that underscores prosecutors' belief about the pervasiveness of the alleged insider trading.

Prosecutors have shied away from indicting large financial firms after their 2002 case against Enron Corp's auditor, Arthur Andersen, helped put that firm out of business.

The indictment comes after a seven-year investigation of SAC and amid a broader crackdown on insider trading that has resulted in more than 70 convictions and guilty pleas.

It is as much a forceful reproof of an era of free-wheeling trading by hedge funds as it is a condemnation of SAC's culture as an alleged breeding ground for traders and analysts who traffic in illegal tips about corporate earnings and buy-outs.

The indictment said SAC's illegal practices ran roughly from 1999 to 2010. SAC and various affiliates were charged with four criminal counts of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud.

"When so many people from a single hedge fund engage in insider trading, it is not a coincidence," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at a press conference. He declined to address how much money the government will seek to have SAC forfeit.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain will oversee the criminal case, and an initial hearing is scheduled for Friday morning. A colleague, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan, will oversee the civil forfeiture case, according to court records.

In Washington, lawmakers critical of prosecutors' past efforts to go after Wall Street heavyweights applauded the indictment.

"They deserve credit for taking on a big, challenging case," said Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican of Iowa whose office has conducted its own probe of Cohen and SAC Capital.

"LIKE A MOVIE"

Launched in 1992 with just $25 million, SAC became the most successful hedge fund to rely on the so-called mosaic theory of investing, which builds investment theses on stocks by gathering information from multiple sources.

Cohen has been able to generate average annualized returns of 25 percent, far outpacing most rivals.

That has helped him to charge a 3 percent management fee and keep 50 percent of investment profits. A typical hedge fund manager gets a 2 percent fee and 20 percent of the profits.

SAC's success has also enabled Cohen to spend well, and he has become known for his collection of expensive art and real estate holdings. Cohen recently paid casino mogul Steve Wynn a reported $155 million for Pablo Picasso's "Le Rêve," and owns properties valued well into eight figures.

Many investors stuck with Cohen despite years of speculation about improper trading. But over recent months they requested about $4 billion in withdrawals as investigators closed in.

SAC generates more than $300 million annually in trading fees for Wall Street brokerages large and small, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Jefferies & Co.

Although SAC has $6 billion to $8 billion of cash, according to people familiar with its finances, some question how effectively it can operate. "It's an ugly situation," said an executive at one counterparty.

On Thursday, extra security was posted outside SAC's Stamford office, and reporters were kept far away. One employee at the firm's New York office said there were no recent internal signs of panic or anxiety. "It's like a movie," he said.

COOPERATING WITNESSES

Prosecutors built their case against SAC with help from several former employees, including Noah Freeman, Jon Horvath, Donald Longueuil and Wesley Wang, who pleaded guilty to charges of criminal insider trading.

Among suspect trades was Cohen's August 2008 sale of a $12.5 million stake in Dell Inc, launched within 10 minutes after he was forwarded an email in which Horvath told Steinberg, based on a "2nd hand read from someone at the company," that the computer maker's earnings would disappoint.

Cohen's lawyers this week said he never read that email.

The indictment also alludes to Cohen hiring a new employee, Richard Lee, despite a warning that he had been in another fund's "insider trading group." Lee pleaded guilty on July 23 to securities fraud and conspiracy involving trades in Yahoo Inc and 3Com Corp.

The indictment does not identify the fund, but a person familiar with the matter said it was Kenneth Griffin's Citadel Investment Group. Citadel managed roughly $13.3 billion at year end.

A Citadel spokeswoman, Katie Spring, said Lee was fired in 2008 for breaching company rules, not insider trading. "There is no insider trading group at Citadel," she added.

The criminal case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-cr-00541. The civil case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al in the same court, No. 13-05182.

(Reporting by Michael Erman, Emily Flitter, David Henry, Lauren Tara LaCapra, Jonathan Stempel, Bernard Vaughan and Katya Wachtel in New York; Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston; Peter Rudegeair in Stamford, Connecticut; and Sarah N. Lynch in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Matthew Goldstein, Grant McCool, Paritosh Bansal, Dan Grebler, Leslie Adler)


View the original article here

U.S. charges SAC Capital with insider trading crimes

United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Segar

1 of 5. United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

By Emily Flitter, Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:49pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors indicted billionaire Steven A. Cohen's hedge fund for insider trading, a rare move that could end the career of one of Wall Street's most successful investors and trigger a fundamental change in how traders try to gain an edge over rivals.

The government accused SAC Capital Advisors LP of presiding over a culture where employees flouted the law and were encouraged to tap their personal networks of contacts for inside information about publicly traded companies.

The result was "insider trading that was substantial, pervasive and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry," the indictment said.

While not personally charged criminally, Cohen joins junk bond financier Michael Milken and Galleon Group hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam among prominent Wall Street executives who have been linked to insider trading.

The indictment filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against SAC, together with a related civil case seeking forfeitures and money laundering penalties, imperils the future of the roughly $15 billion hedge fund.

It also may end Cohen's career of managing outside money, where he generated some of the hedge fund industry's best returns and became one of the foremost traders of his generation.

Last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Cohen in a civil case with failing to supervise two employees, Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg. Both men have pleaded not guilty to criminal insider trading charges and face trials in November.

Many Wall Street firms that lend money to and trade with Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC may stop or pull back because of Thursday's criminal charges, though some said on they would take a wait-and-see approach.

Cohen may yet be able to stay in business because more than $8 billion of the fund's assets belong to him and his employees.

SAC said in a statement it has no plans to shut down.

"SAC has never encouraged, promoted or tolerated insider trading and takes its compliance and management obligations seriously," it said. "The handful of men who admit they broke the law does not reflect the honesty, integrity and character of the thousands of men and women who have worked at SAC over the past 21 years. SAC will continue to operate as we work through these matters."

VIRTUAL SLAM DUNK?

The government's indictment of SAC Capital also will stand as the signature action of its multi-year crackdown on insider trading in the $2.25 trillion hedge fund industry.

The investigation burst into the open in October 2009 with the arrest of Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, and led to the conviction of more than 60 people including Rajaratnam. But for authorities Cohen always was the big fish to be caught because he loomed large over the hedge fund industry.

In fact, when Cohen first opened shop, hedge funds were not well understood and the industry was a fraction of its current size, with funds managing well under $1 trillion. But in large part because of the success of firms like SAC Capital, hedge fund managers surpassed investment bankers and even some bank chief executive officers in terms of fame and fortune.

Over the years, Cohen has been the subject of two Vanity Fair magazine stories, countless front-page stories in The New York Times, and is maybe just as famous in the art world for his prized collection of works by Damien Hirst, Jeff Koons and Pablo Picasso.

More recently, he tried to become the owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, but instead settled for a minority stake in the New York Mets. As the scrutiny of Cohen and his firm has risen in recent year, he's became more visible at hedge fund events, donating money to charities and buying even more artwork.

Several lawyers, including former federal prosecutors, said a decision not to criminally charge Cohen might signal an admission that there is a shortage of evidence against him.

But the indictment does not preclude the government from gathering more evidence and filing new charges later. Some lawyers believe the case against SAC is strong now.

"It's going to be a virtual slam dunk for the prosecution," said Solomon Wisenberg, a partner at Barnes & Thornburg in Washington, D.C., and author of "White Collar Crime: Securities Fraud."

"The story is basically that there's a whole culture here where red flags were ignored, (and) compliance efforts were more or less window dressing."

The Justice Department's decision to indict SAC, and not just individuals, is an unusual move that underscores prosecutors' belief about the pervasiveness of the alleged insider trading.

Prosecutors have shied away from indicting large financial firms after their 2002 case against Enron Corp's auditor, Arthur Andersen, helped put that firm out of business.

The indictment comes after a seven-year investigation of SAC and amid a broader crackdown on insider trading that has resulted in more than 70 convictions and guilty pleas.

It is as much a forceful reproof of an era of free-wheeling trading by hedge funds as it is a condemnation of SAC's culture as an alleged breeding ground for traders and analysts who traffic in illegal tips about corporate earnings and buy-outs.

The indictment said SAC's illegal practices ran roughly from 1999 to 2010. SAC and various affiliates were charged with four criminal counts of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud.

"When so many people from a single hedge fund engage in insider trading, it is not a coincidence," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at a press conference. He declined to address how much money the government will seek to have SAC forfeit.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain will oversee the criminal case, and an initial hearing is scheduled for Friday morning. A colleague, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan, will oversee the civil forfeiture case, according to court records.

In Washington, lawmakers critical of prosecutors' past efforts to go after Wall Street heavyweights applauded the indictment.

"They deserve credit for taking on a big, challenging case," said Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican of Iowa whose office has conducted its own probe of Cohen and SAC Capital.

"LIKE A MOVIE"

Launched in 1992 with just $25 million, SAC became the most successful hedge fund to rely on the so-called mosaic theory of investing, which builds investment theses on stocks by gathering information from multiple sources.

Cohen has been able to generate average annualized returns of 25 percent, far outpacing most rivals.

That has helped him to charge a 3 percent management fee and keep 50 percent of investment profits. A typical hedge fund manager gets a 2 percent fee and 20 percent of the profits.

SAC's success has also enabled Cohen to spend well, and he has become known for his collection of expensive art and real estate holdings. Cohen recently paid casino mogul Steve Wynn a reported $155 million for Pablo Picasso's "Le Rêve," and owns properties valued well into eight figures.

Many investors stuck with Cohen despite years of speculation about improper trading. But over recent months they requested about $4 billion in withdrawals as investigators closed in.

SAC generates more than $300 million annually in trading fees for Wall Street brokerages large and small, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Jefferies & Co.

Although SAC has $6 billion to $8 billion of cash, according to people familiar with its finances, some question how effectively it can operate. "It's an ugly situation," said an executive at one counterparty.

On Thursday, extra security was posted outside SAC's Stamford office, and reporters were kept far away. One employee at the firm's New York office said there were no recent internal signs of panic or anxiety. "It's like a movie," he said.

COOPERATING WITNESSES

Prosecutors built their case against SAC with help from several former employees, including Noah Freeman, Jon Horvath, Donald Longueuil and Wesley Wang, who pleaded guilty to charges of criminal insider trading.

Among suspect trades was Cohen's August 2008 sale of a $12.5 million stake in Dell Inc, launched within 10 minutes after he was forwarded an email in which Horvath told Steinberg, based on a "2nd hand read from someone at the company," that the computer maker's earnings would disappoint.

Cohen's lawyers this week said he never read that email.

The indictment also alludes to Cohen hiring a new employee, Richard Lee, despite a warning that he had been in another fund's "insider trading group." Lee pleaded guilty on July 23 to securities fraud and conspiracy involving trades in Yahoo Inc and 3Com Corp.

The indictment does not identify the fund, but a person familiar with the matter said it was Kenneth Griffin's Citadel Investment Group. Citadel managed roughly $13.3 billion at year end.

A Citadel spokeswoman, Katie Spring, said Lee was fired in 2008 for breaching company rules, not insider trading. "There is no insider trading group at Citadel," she added.

The criminal case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-cr-00541. The civil case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al in the same court, No. 13-05182.

(Reporting by Michael Erman, Emily Flitter, David Henry, Lauren Tara LaCapra, Jonathan Stempel, Bernard Vaughan and Katya Wachtel in New York; Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston; Peter Rudegeair in Stamford, Connecticut; and Sarah N. Lynch in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Matthew Goldstein, Grant McCool, Paritosh Bansal, Dan Grebler, Leslie Adler)


View the original article here

U.S. charges SAC Capital with insider trading crimes

United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Segar

1 of 5. United States Attorney Preet Bharara speaks during a news conference in New York, July 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

By Emily Flitter, Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:49pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors indicted billionaire Steven A. Cohen's hedge fund for insider trading, a rare move that could end the career of one of Wall Street's most successful investors and trigger a fundamental change in how traders try to gain an edge over rivals.

The government accused SAC Capital Advisors LP of presiding over a culture where employees flouted the law and were encouraged to tap their personal networks of contacts for inside information about publicly traded companies.

The result was "insider trading that was substantial, pervasive and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry," the indictment said.

While not personally charged criminally, Cohen joins junk bond financier Michael Milken and Galleon Group hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam among prominent Wall Street executives who have been linked to insider trading.

The indictment filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against SAC, together with a related civil case seeking forfeitures and money laundering penalties, imperils the future of the roughly $15 billion hedge fund.

It also may end Cohen's career of managing outside money, where he generated some of the hedge fund industry's best returns and became one of the foremost traders of his generation.

Last week, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Cohen in a civil case with failing to supervise two employees, Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg. Both men have pleaded not guilty to criminal insider trading charges and face trials in November.

Many Wall Street firms that lend money to and trade with Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC may stop or pull back because of Thursday's criminal charges, though some said on they would take a wait-and-see approach.

Cohen may yet be able to stay in business because more than $8 billion of the fund's assets belong to him and his employees.

SAC said in a statement it has no plans to shut down.

"SAC has never encouraged, promoted or tolerated insider trading and takes its compliance and management obligations seriously," it said. "The handful of men who admit they broke the law does not reflect the honesty, integrity and character of the thousands of men and women who have worked at SAC over the past 21 years. SAC will continue to operate as we work through these matters."

VIRTUAL SLAM DUNK?

The government's indictment of SAC Capital also will stand as the signature action of its multi-year crackdown on insider trading in the $2.25 trillion hedge fund industry.

The investigation burst into the open in October 2009 with the arrest of Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, and led to the conviction of more than 60 people including Rajaratnam. But for authorities Cohen always was the big fish to be caught because he loomed large over the hedge fund industry.

In fact, when Cohen first opened shop, hedge funds were not well understood and the industry was a fraction of its current size, with funds managing well under $1 trillion. But in large part because of the success of firms like SAC Capital, hedge fund managers surpassed investment bankers and even some bank chief executive officers in terms of fame and fortune.

Over the years, Cohen has been the subject of two Vanity Fair magazine stories, countless front-page stories in The New York Times, and is maybe just as famous in the art world for his prized collection of works by Damien Hirst, Jeff Koons and Pablo Picasso.

More recently, he tried to become the owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, but instead settled for a minority stake in the New York Mets. As the scrutiny of Cohen and his firm has risen in recent year, he's became more visible at hedge fund events, donating money to charities and buying even more artwork.

Several lawyers, including former federal prosecutors, said a decision not to criminally charge Cohen might signal an admission that there is a shortage of evidence against him.

But the indictment does not preclude the government from gathering more evidence and filing new charges later. Some lawyers believe the case against SAC is strong now.

"It's going to be a virtual slam dunk for the prosecution," said Solomon Wisenberg, a partner at Barnes & Thornburg in Washington, D.C., and author of "White Collar Crime: Securities Fraud."

"The story is basically that there's a whole culture here where red flags were ignored, (and) compliance efforts were more or less window dressing."

The Justice Department's decision to indict SAC, and not just individuals, is an unusual move that underscores prosecutors' belief about the pervasiveness of the alleged insider trading.

Prosecutors have shied away from indicting large financial firms after their 2002 case against Enron Corp's auditor, Arthur Andersen, helped put that firm out of business.

The indictment comes after a seven-year investigation of SAC and amid a broader crackdown on insider trading that has resulted in more than 70 convictions and guilty pleas.

It is as much a forceful reproof of an era of free-wheeling trading by hedge funds as it is a condemnation of SAC's culture as an alleged breeding ground for traders and analysts who traffic in illegal tips about corporate earnings and buy-outs.

The indictment said SAC's illegal practices ran roughly from 1999 to 2010. SAC and various affiliates were charged with four criminal counts of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud.

"When so many people from a single hedge fund engage in insider trading, it is not a coincidence," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at a press conference. He declined to address how much money the government will seek to have SAC forfeit.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain will oversee the criminal case, and an initial hearing is scheduled for Friday morning. A colleague, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan, will oversee the civil forfeiture case, according to court records.

In Washington, lawmakers critical of prosecutors' past efforts to go after Wall Street heavyweights applauded the indictment.

"They deserve credit for taking on a big, challenging case," said Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican of Iowa whose office has conducted its own probe of Cohen and SAC Capital.

"LIKE A MOVIE"

Launched in 1992 with just $25 million, SAC became the most successful hedge fund to rely on the so-called mosaic theory of investing, which builds investment theses on stocks by gathering information from multiple sources.

Cohen has been able to generate average annualized returns of 25 percent, far outpacing most rivals.

That has helped him to charge a 3 percent management fee and keep 50 percent of investment profits. A typical hedge fund manager gets a 2 percent fee and 20 percent of the profits.

SAC's success has also enabled Cohen to spend well, and he has become known for his collection of expensive art and real estate holdings. Cohen recently paid casino mogul Steve Wynn a reported $155 million for Pablo Picasso's "Le Rêve," and owns properties valued well into eight figures.

Many investors stuck with Cohen despite years of speculation about improper trading. But over recent months they requested about $4 billion in withdrawals as investigators closed in.

SAC generates more than $300 million annually in trading fees for Wall Street brokerages large and small, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Jefferies & Co.

Although SAC has $6 billion to $8 billion of cash, according to people familiar with its finances, some question how effectively it can operate. "It's an ugly situation," said an executive at one counterparty.

On Thursday, extra security was posted outside SAC's Stamford office, and reporters were kept far away. One employee at the firm's New York office said there were no recent internal signs of panic or anxiety. "It's like a movie," he said.

COOPERATING WITNESSES

Prosecutors built their case against SAC with help from several former employees, including Noah Freeman, Jon Horvath, Donald Longueuil and Wesley Wang, who pleaded guilty to charges of criminal insider trading.

Among suspect trades was Cohen's August 2008 sale of a $12.5 million stake in Dell Inc, launched within 10 minutes after he was forwarded an email in which Horvath told Steinberg, based on a "2nd hand read from someone at the company," that the computer maker's earnings would disappoint.

Cohen's lawyers this week said he never read that email.

The indictment also alludes to Cohen hiring a new employee, Richard Lee, despite a warning that he had been in another fund's "insider trading group." Lee pleaded guilty on July 23 to securities fraud and conspiracy involving trades in Yahoo Inc and 3Com Corp.

The indictment does not identify the fund, but a person familiar with the matter said it was Kenneth Griffin's Citadel Investment Group. Citadel managed roughly $13.3 billion at year end.

A Citadel spokeswoman, Katie Spring, said Lee was fired in 2008 for breaching company rules, not insider trading. "There is no insider trading group at Citadel," she added.

The criminal case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-cr-00541. The civil case is U.S. v. SAC Capital Advisors LP et al in the same court, No. 13-05182.

(Reporting by Michael Erman, Emily Flitter, David Henry, Lauren Tara LaCapra, Jonathan Stempel, Bernard Vaughan and Katya Wachtel in New York; Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston; Peter Rudegeair in Stamford, Connecticut; and Sarah N. Lynch in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Matthew Goldstein, Grant McCool, Paritosh Bansal, Dan Grebler, Leslie Adler)


View the original article here